ANOTHER ROUND OF FAITH BASED / EVANGELICAL EMPHASIS FOR GLOBALIST WEF IS SET FOR THE JANUARY DAVOS 2024 MEETINGS. COLLABORATING WITH NGOs, LABOR LEADERS, CIVIL SOCIETY ADVOCATES, ASPENS INSTITUTE, AND A HODGE PODGE OF INTERFAITH RELIGIOUS COMPROMISERS-WEF TAKES “FAITH IN ACTION” INTO HIGH GEAR FOR 2024 U S ELECTION CYCLE AND RUN UP TO 2030 GLOBAL GOALS.
Rev Thomas Littleton
12/14/2023
“col·lab·o·ra·tion”
/kəˌlabəˈrāSH(ə)n/-
2. “traitorous cooperation with an enemy.”
WEF/DAVOS 2024 “FAITH IN ACTION “
https://www.weforum.org/projects/faith-in-action/
Faith in Action
“The world is undergoing deep, complex and accelerated transformations, and neither government, nor business, nor civil society alone can address our common challenges. Religion, values and spirituality continue to shape the societal transformations of today – economic, geopolitical, technological and cultural. With over 80% of the global population adhering to religious and spiritual traditions, the influence of faith today underlines the need for multi-stakeholder action to solve global challenges and build social cohesion.”
“As part of its Civil Society Communities and across our Centres, the World Economic Forum engages roughly 125 religious leaders, faith-based organizations, interfaith groups, multi-faith networks, and experts of religion from over 10 of the world’s major religions and spiritual traditions.”
“In partnership with key global faith representatives, experts and community leaders, the Forum will launch a report (entitled “Faith in Action) in January 2024. The report will highlight contributions that faith communities and organizations are providing through public private partnerships. Covering key thematic areas for public-private cooperation (from urban transformation to climate action), the report will discuss the impact of religion and spirituality towards public private cooperation in today’s polycrisis and provide a roadmap for transformative partnerships with business, government and philanthropic organizations.”
“The report aims to accelerate the prosocial good of faith through multi-stakeholder partnerships, spotlighting key case studies of existing partnerships and what’s needed for meaningful collaboration between faith, business and other stakeholders. Case studies will focus on the impact of faith and areas of public-private cooperation, including: environmental care; health and healthcare; inclusive societies and social justice; just transition and sustainability; peace and reconciliation; technology and trust; thriving cities; values based investments and industry transformation.”
“In collaboration with report partners, the Forum is gathering case studies through the Faith in Action survey. To submit your impact examples on faith and public-private cooperation, please visit wef.ch/faithsurvey. The deadline to submit survey responses is September 15th, 2023. The full list of survey questions can be found here.”
SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON FAITH IN ACTION SURVEY
https://weforum.ent.box.com/s/kkzal8npnmeyri2pirhyf6f4f9a6frog
“What is the name of the faith and business project?
Does the project have a website? If so please provide the project’s website address.
Describe the faith & business project in 300 words or less:
Does the faith & business project work in any of the following sectors? Check all that apply.”
o Environmental Care: Accelerating climate action towards net zero, circular
economies, and regenerative food, water and ocean systems.
o Values Based Investments and Industry Transformation: Allocating capital and
investment to support planet, people and communities
o Health and Healthcare: Scaling solutions for more resilient, efficient and equitable
healthcare systems.
o Inclusive Societies and Social Justice: Shaping inclusive, just, and equitable
societies that create opportunities for all.
o Thriving Cities: Strengthening community resiliency and local economies.
o Technology and Trust: Promoting ethical, human-centered and society-serving
technologies.
o Peace and Reconciliation: Helping progress peace within complex geopolitical
landscapes.
o Just Transition and Sustainability: Ensuring the energy transition is sustainable,
secure, resilient and affordable.
o Other impact areas not listed above:”
“What type of organization are you? Please select the description that best describes your
organization:
o Primary religious organization: These are organizations that have a primary religious
function and purpose like a church, a mosque, a temple, a denomination, a religious
order, etc.
o Secondary religious organization: This is a non-profit organization or charity that has
a religious mission.
o Indigenous led organization: This is an organization, instrument, agency, or other
body made up of a majority of Indigenous individuals.
o Indigenous community based organization: This is a nonprofit organization which is
representative of an Indigenous community or significant segments of an Indigenous
community Religious business: This is a business that self-identifies, either publicly or
privately, as guided by principles, values, and/or objectives associated with formal
religions or faiths.
o Spiritually centered and/or values led business: This is a business that has spiritual
and/or value driven sensibilities that are not directly aligned or associated with formal
religions or faiths.
o Non-religious business: A business that is operated without any religious
considerations. Non-religious non-profit/charity: This is a non-profit or charity that is
operated without any religious considerations.
o Public sector organization: This is a public sector entity working at the intersection of
faith and the public sector, and/or business.”
“Who are the primary beneficiaries of the project? Check all that apply.
o Children (i.e., 1-12 yrs. old) Young people (i.e., 13-21 yrs. old)
o Women
o Men
o Families
o Marginalized groups. Please list the marginalized groups your project helps.
o If your work is focused on beneficial outcomes for the environment, or other
outcomes than those human beneficiaries listed above, please name/describe the
beneficial outcome of your project(s), and if possible a quantitative measure of your
impact, e.g., “Old growth forest/50,000 acres.”
Beneficiary: (describe the beneficiary)
Quantitative Measure”
“To your knowledge and/or experience what are the most important factors for achieving
successful faith & business projects?
Important factor for successful faith & business projects:
Important factor for successful faith & business projects:
Important factor for successful faith & business projects:”
THE DAVOS DREAM TEAM
Partners
3BL Associates
Abu Dhabi Forum for Peace
ACT Alliance
Anti-Defamation League
Aspen Institute
Baha’i International Community
Conference of European Rabbis
Council for Inclusive Capitalism
El-Hibri Foundation
Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
International Christian Union of Business Executives (UNIAPAC)
Mahamakut Buddhist University
Mata Amritanandamayi Math
Nishkam Centre
Religions for Peace
Religious Freedom & Business Foundation
Songdhammakalyani Monastry
Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding
United Nations
World Evangelical Alliance
LEADERS FROM THESE ORGANIZATIONS
David Sangokoya, Head of Civil Society Impact, World Economic Forum
Jack Hildebrand, Community Specialist, Civil Society, World Economic Forum
Natalie Cilem, Community Specialist, Civil Society, World Economic Forum
Gopal Patel, Co-Founder and Director, Bhumi Global; Co-Chair, UN Multifaith Advisory Council
Chris Elisara, PhD, Co-Director, World Evangelical Alliance Sustainability Center
Faith in Action Report Advisory Board:
Tariq Al-Olaimy, Co-Founder, 3BL Associates
Amma, Founder, Mata Amritanandamayi Math
Venerable Dhammananda Bhikkhuni, Abbess, Songdhammakalyani Temple
H.E. Sheikh Abdullah Bin Bayyah, Secretary General, Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies
Alexis Crow, Partner; Global Head, Geopolitical Investing, PwC
Rudelmar Bueno de Faria, General Secretary, ACT Alliance
Bani Dugal, Principal Representative to the United Nations, Bahá’í International Community
Reverend Mark E. Fowler, CEO, Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding
Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, President, Conference of European Rabbis
Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO and National Director, Anti-Defamation League
Brian Grim, Founding President, Religious Freedom and Business Foundation
Azza Karam, Board Member, United Nations’ Secretary General High Level Advisor Board on Multilateralism
Farhan Latif, President, El-Hibri Foundation
Brie Loskota, Executive Director, Martin Marty Centre for Public Understanding of Religion, University of Chicago
Martin Palmer, Founding President and Chief Executive, FaithInvest
Venerable Anil Sakya, Deputy Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mahamakut Buddhist University
Bp. Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher, Secretary General, World Evangelical Alliance
H.E. Bhai Sahib Mohinder Singh, Spiritual Leader and Chairman, Guru Nanak Nishkam Sewak Jatha
Simran Jeet Singh, Executive Director, Aspen Institute’s Religion and Society Program
Meredith Sumpter, CEO, Council for Inclusive Capitalism
Sir Mark V. Vlasic, KCHS, KCEM, CBS Television Studies
Rodrigo Whitelaw, General Secretary, International Christian Union of Business Executives (UNIAPAC)
Joshua Zinner, CEO, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility
(NOTE- biography on WEF/ Faith in Action leader shows special focus on Social Justice and LGBTQ equality .
About Sangokoya who leads the “Faith in Action”WEF research.
“David Sangokoya is the Head of Civil Society Impact at the World Economic Forum. Based in Geneva, he is responsible for the Forum’s engagement and inclusion of nonprofits, marginalized communities, labour unions, social movements, religious organizations, and civil society innovators across its Centres and multi-stakeholder initiatives. In his role David drives the Forum’s stakeholder inclusion agenda and accelerates the impact of over 120 civil society partnerships across the Forum’s Centres on climate and nature action; industry transformation; social justice and inclusive economies; technology; and geopolitics. He additionally oversees the Global Future Councils on Human Rights, Social Cohesion and Just Transition; the Partnering with Civil Society in the Fourth Industrial Revolution initiative; and co-founded both the Forum’s internal Black and LGBTQI+ employee resource groups. David sits on the board of WINGS, a network of over 170 philanthropy development and support organizations across 57 countries committed to ensuring philanthropy reaches its fullest potential as a catalyst for social progress…With fifteen years of experience in research and global project management, David has worked at the intersection of social justice, sustainable development and responsible digital transformation.”
WEF/DAVOS CENTRAL FOCUS FOR DAVOS 2023 WAS “PRIDE ON THE PROMENADE ” LGBTQ + SOLIDARITY ON DAVOS MAINSTREET .
WORLD EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE PLAYING A KEY ROLE
“World Economic Forum Report: Faith in Action The World Economic Forum will release a report entitled “Faith in Action” in January 2024 at Davos. Learn more:
WEA LEADERS INVOLVED
Chris Elisara, PhD, Co-Director, World Evangelical Alliance Sustainability Center
Bp. Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher, Secretary General, World Evangelical Alliance
WEA “EMERGING LEADERS SUMMIT 2023 SET FORTH SOME OF THE “VALUES” AND POSITION STATEMENTS.
“Here are a few samples of participant comments:
- “We need a church with a radical sense of urgency because comfort and prosperity have become a plague to our church.”
- “Ministry without collaboration is like a journey without a destiny. To reach our destiny, it is essential to collaborate with people and move on.”
- “Collaboration must begin within our own environment before we can spread it to others.”
- “The urgency about making disciples and then having disciples make disciples is very important in fulfilling the Great Commission.”
- “The church has forgotten its primary duty to fulfill the mission it was called for. Through this conference, I have made a new commitment to mission.”
For a brief taste of the ELS experience, you can view this summary video.”
WEF “CIVIL SOCIETY”DRIVEN PROPAGANDA OF THE MOVEMENT- NOT REALM FOR CHRISTIAN FAITH
https://www.weforum.org/communities/civil-society/
“As part of the Forum’s multi-stakeholder approach, a diverse community of civil society leaders come together to find solutions, drive impact and advance multi-stakeholder cooperation with government and business leaders. The Forum’s Civil Society Community includes the engagement of the most influential organizations representing the interests of citizens, consumers, marginalized populations, workers, grassroots movements and social causes, including: international non-governmental organizations (INGOs); non-governmental organizations (NGOs), non-profits and charities; trade unions and labour organizations; social movements and activists, indigenous leaders and indigenous knowledge holders; community organizations; faith-based organizations and religious leaders.”
“Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), labour and religious leaders, faith-based organizations and other civil society stakeholders are key members of the World Economic Forum’s multistakeholder platform.”
“Civil society actors from a wide range of fields come together to collaborate with government and business leaders on finding and advocating solutions to global challenges. They also focus on how to best leverage the transformation brought by the Fourth Industrial Revolution and partner with industry, philanthropy, government, and academia to take action and engage in the development, deployment, use, and governance of technology.”
(NOTE IN 2015 THE LAUSANNE MOVEMENT, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS AND OTHER WORLD EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE AFFILIATES LED BY EVANGELICAL OPERATIVES SUCH AS TIM KELLER, ED STETZER, RICK WARREN AND DAVID PLATT SOUGHT TO LAUNCH “CIVILITAS” A NOW FAILED ATTEMPT TO REDEFINE CHRISTIAN MISSION WITH SOCIAL JUSTICE AND GLOBAL GOALS “CIVIL SOCIETY” ASSERTING THAT “LACK OF CIVILITY’ WAS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO SOCIETY IN THE MODERN ERA. THE EFFORTS FELL FLAT AND THE WEBSITE AND MANIFESTO CAN ONLY BE FOUND ON INTERNET ARCHIVE SITES. SEE THE PROPAGANDA FILLED LAUSANNE / IASC /FRANKFURT SCHOOL INSPIRED RUBBISH AT THE ARCHIVE LINK BELOW.)
WEA AFFILATE ORGANIZATION LAUSANNE MOEMENT IS CELBRATING 50 YEARS WITH A PRAYER GUIDE AND DOUBLING DOWN ON ITS GLOBAL GOALS AGENDA.
” One of the fruits of the Lausanne Congress was the Lausanne Covenant, a declaration of
evangelical faith which has become a point of reference for the mission of evangelical
believers in the world. 50 years later, this International Week of Prayer of the European
Evangelical Alliance gives us the opportunity to reconsider the Covenant”
CIVILITAS -LAUSANNE 2015
This horrific failed politically motivated call by Civilitas was led by Lausanne and included many key leaders among American biblically conservative movements .It was drafted largely by the Frankfurt School Inspired Institutes for Advanced Studies in Culture and featured the Chik-Fil -A corporate compromise with the LGBTQ agenda as a primary example of embracing and living out the “Civilitas Vision” . As with most IASC/ James Davison Hunter operations -it sought to shame biblically convictional Christians for their conservative social and political stance and more them LEFT toward a classic “Third Way” compromise and eventual collapse.
“Civil conversations will work to change the tone of our
society by supplanting vitriolic public discourse with respectful
listening, constructive exchange, and positive partnerships.
Dan Cathy, President and CEO of Chick-Fil-A developed an
improbable model of such civility in a surprising friendship with
Shane Windmeyer, national director of the LGBT group Campus
Pride.”
GEO-POLITICAL FOCUS:WEF /LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS SHARE CONCERN OVER HOW EVANGELICALS VOTED IN 2016 AND 2020 : THE PROBLEM MUST BE FIXED
NOTE- THAT WEF TURNED TO THE HEADQUARTERS OF FABIAN SOCIALSM -THE SELF PROFESSED WOLVES IN SHEEPS CLOTHING WHO CLOAK THEMSELVES IN RELIGIOUS GARMETS TO DECEIVE CHRISTIANS.LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS VOICE WEF/DAVOS/ GLOBALIST CONCENRS OVER HOW AND WHY CHRISTIANS VOTE:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Apr 26, 2021
Evangelicals and Their Politics: Dispatches from the Field
“Then-President Donald Trump is surrounded by evangelical leaders during the Announcement of the Guidance on Constitutional Prayer in Public Schools, January 2020 | Photo: The White House“
(NOTE THE CENTRAL CONCERN OF LSE/WEF- “As has been well-documented by now, American evangelicals do not separate their faith from politics. They see political engagement as a civic responsibility that is deeply entwined with and influenced by their faith.” EXCERPT FROM FULL ARTICLE REPRINTED BELOW.)
“In the 2016 and 2020 US Presidential elections, evangelical Christians voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. In this blog post, Dr Katie Gaddini of UCL unpicks the political relationship this type of Christianity had with Donald Trump, how it changed in 2020, and what it means for American politics moving forward. “
“RGS and the US Centre’s USAPP Blog have launched a new joint series focusing on religion in American society, bringing in experts to explore the relationship different faith groups have with American society. Join us on 15 June, as we host a free LSE Public Lecture titled Religious Freedom under the Biden Administration with the US Centre and Department of International Relations.“
“In 2016, 81% of evangelical Christians voted for Donald Trump for the 45th President of the United States. Although evangelicals have aligned with the Republican party for decades, this vote amounted to the largest evangelical vote in nearly twenty years. Many journalists, academics, and even some Christian leaders reacted to the 2016 election with dismay at what they saw as the incongruency between evangelical values and Trump’s behaviour, including two divorces, numerous affairs, and countless indiscretions. Four years later, these same journalists, academics and Christian leaders waited to see what Trump’s evangelical base would do at the 2020 Presidential election. Would an impeachment trial, allegations of sexual misconduct and hundreds of controversial Twitter posts be enough to dissuade evangelicals from voting for Trump again?”
“It turns out the answer is a resounding no. Exit polls from the 2020 election estimate that anywhere from 76-81% of evangelicals voted for Trump, meaning that his evangelical base remained committed. For those of us who research evangelicalism and politics these figures do not come as a surprise. For one thing, evangelicals’ approval for Trump remained high throughout his presidency, largely because Trump introduced and upheld the political issues that evangelicals hold dear, including pro-life, pro-Israel, and pro-abstinence-only education policies. But there are other, more nuanced reasons that evangelicals voted again for Donald Trump as President, which I have discovered through my on-going qualitative research on evangelical Christianity and politics in America. Here, I offer some brief dispatches from the field – bearing in mind that “the field,” just like religion and politics moreover, is fluid and ever-changing.”
“Revisiting 2016“
“When I interviewed American evangelicals and British evangelicals in 2016, I wanted to compare their attitudes towards two major political events: the presidential election and Brexit, respectively. As has been well-documented by now, American evangelicals do not separate their faith from politics. They see political engagement as a civic responsibility that is deeply entwined with and influenced by their faith. Interestingly, British evangelicals feel similarly, even though they tend to align with political issues rather than political parties. The two churches that my research participants attended shared a close connection: they sang the same worship songs on Sunday, they read the same Bible-study books, pastors often moved between the two churches, and congregants made pilgrimage-like trips across the Atlantic to visit one another. Their views on how faith intersects with politics, however, differed dramatically. While the American evangelicals I spoke with voted for Trump because of his strict immigration policies, their British counterparts voted against Brexit for the very same reason. Both groups relied on scripture to defend their position and both saw immigration as intimately linked to their faith. However, as this research demonstrates, what it means to be an ‘evangelical’ in the US is different from in the UK, even when key tenants of their faith and religious practices remain the same. Like all identities ‘evangelical’ is an inherently empty category and is dependent on its social-historical-political context for meaning. And in 2016, the interaction of fundamental identities – religious, political, and national – led to very different priorities for these two groups of evangelicals.”
2020
“Four years later I once again found myself conducting interviews with evangelicals ahead of a presidential election. However, my findings so far show that although immigration remains a top concern for American evangelicals, it is no longer the top concern. Without a doubt, there are two major events of the past year which shaped evangelicals’ political priorities when it came time to vote last November. Firstly, the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests, which ripped across the United States in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death in June 2020, became a top concern for evangelical voters. For evangelicals living near cities in blue states, such as Seattle, where the protests were especially active, the BLM protests strengthened their support for Trump, who they saw as a stabilising force and a President committed to stamping out identity politics. Moreover, they view Trump as committed to challenging mainstream liberal media, which often emphasised the peacefulness of the BLM protests in reportage, instead of the violence—and symbolised a much larger battle conservative evangelicals are waging against the censorship of free and fair speech.”
“The second concern for evangelical voters last November was the Covid-19 pandemic. In the words of one of my research participants who works for a Republican lobbying firm: “If it wasn’t for the pandemic, Trump would have won again, no question.” He stated this opinion in reference to Republican voters overall, yet for the evangelicals I interviewed, the pandemic solidified their support for Trump. As an anti-establishment President waging war with the mainstream media and the World Health Organisation, Trump was the last stalwart of freedom in the era of lockdowns, mass vaccination programmes and mandatory mask-wearing. For a group deeply dedicated to freedom – the freedom to bear arms, the freedom of speech, the freedom to worship as they want – the restrictions that politicians have imposed in the name of the Covid-19 pandemic, have caused many evangelicals to cling even more staunchly to their understanding of freedom, which they believe is the bedrock of American democracy. And which they fear is in grave danger under a Democratic President and an on-going pandemic.”
“What Now?“
“Six months later, even though Trump is no longer President, his brand of politics – irreverent, anti-establishment, and determined – continues. The question is: what now? What will happen with the 74 million people who voted for Trump in 2020, significant numbers of which are evangelical Christians? To which politicians, social movements, and issues will Trump’s evangelical base turn? Both well-established and up-and-coming GOP politicians who espouse Trumpist ideology, such as Madison Cawthorne, Ted Cruz, and Cindy Hyde-Smith, continue to garner the favour of many evangelicals, as evidenced by the Cruz and Hyde-Smith’s recent visit to the US-Mexico border. Will one of them run in the 2024 Presidential election?”
“For a scholar of evangelical Christianity, I am asking all of these questions, as well as wondering how the imbrication of religion and politics in America will twist and turn over the coming years shaping both evangelical culture and the political impact to which it aspires.”
“Note: This piece gives the views of the author, and not the position of the LSE Religion and Global Society blog, nor of the London School of Economics.“
LABOR LEADERS -NEW TO THE PATNERSHIPS
(NOTE : IN ORDER TO AID THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATIONS EFFORTS TO RE-ENERGIZE IT’S BASE AMONG LABOR UNIONS AND TO ESCAPE THE APPEARANCE OF BEING “IN BED WITH CORPORATE SELF INTEREST” AND “BIG BUSINESS CRONY CAPITALIST IN THE FAITH BASED COLLABORATION/ PARTNERSHIPS – BIG LABOR “LEADERS” HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE WEF “CIVIL SOCIETY LINE UP.)
“Labour Leaders”
“Labour organizations are crucial to ensuring that economic policies are more inclusive and that workers’ issues are addressed by decision-makers. This is why labor unions and worker organizations are engaged in dialogues and initiatives on globalization, economic revitalization, environment, employment, and social protection, the global financial system, financial inclusion, the future of work, and sustainable production.”
“Labour Leaders are actively engaged in the World Economic Forum’s annual and regional meetings and summits, Global Future Councils, and platforms. Deeper interaction and integration have led to substantive involvement in a range of international governance processes and sector-led dialogues.”
GLOBAL FUTURE COUNCILS OF WEF AND COLLABORATION
“The World Economic Forum’s network of Global Future Councils is the world’s foremost multistakeholder and interdisciplinary knowledge network dedicated to promoting innovative thinking to shape a more resilient, inclusive and sustainable future. “
“The network convenes around 600 of the most relevant and knowledgeable thought leaders from academia, government, international organizations, business, and civil society, grouped in expertise-based thematic councils. It is an invitation-only community and members are nominated for a two-year term.”
Mission“
“The Network helps to identify and disseminate transformative ideas with the potential for global impact. The Global Future Council members provide strategic insights, scientific evidence, forward guidance, and multidisciplinary understanding of major issues through:”
• Fresh ideas and innovative thinking: Nurturing cutting-edge and disruptive ideas and developing the foresight to identify and shape key areas
• Grounding in expertise and evidence: Providing a foundation for data-, evidence-, fact- and research-based public-private cooperation
• Interdisciplinary and systems approach: Connecting the dots between established and frontier issues and integrating thought leaders from business, academia, civil society, government and international organizations”
“Councils play two types of roles – Frontier exploration to address cutting-edge themes that have transformative potential, infuse new ideas, connect frontier thinkers and serve as test beds for future workstreams; and, systems thinking to contribute in a meaningful way to complex global discussions and issues where a multistakeholder group of constituents can drive positive systemic change.”
Members’ engagement
“The Global Future Councils are invitation-only communities and members are invited for a two-year term. Council members participate regularly in virtual interactions and council activities via the Forum’s TopLink platform, email and regular meetings. Each council’s insights are also taken forward by the Forum’s ongoing initiatives, communities and meetings to ensure impact and influence. “
CONCLUSION
WORLD EVANGLEICAL ALLIANCE has not only openly embraced the United Nations and World Economic Forum AGENDA 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals but it has committed long term to influencing and recruiting the entire evangleical community with it’s denominations, churches, missions organizations, Christian education institutions and parachurch organizations into the grand end times globalist anti/christ deceptions. This demonic hoard promises to be one of the most broadly influential contaminations and infiltrations by false doctrine of the UN’s deadly multifaith spirituality that the church has ever experienced. It is truly apocalyptic and prophetic in scope. Get out of any church and STOP donating money to every organization which supports WEA/Lausanne/ NAE or those key evangelical deceivers who promote these errors.
thirtypiecesofsilverdotorg 
.jpg){kind=link}