SINCE 2013 THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND HAS BEEN WORKING TO MANIPULATE ITS CONGREGANTS TO ACCEPT THE LAW PARLIAMENT PASSED MAKING SAME SEX MARRIAGE LEGAL. ACTIVIST LIKE SAM ALLBERRY AND HIS “LIVING OUT” MINISTRY BECAME THE CENTRAL VOICES TO CONSERVATIVE CHURCH GOERS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ATLANTIC. NOW IT IS CLEAR THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND WAS WORKING THE ISSUE TOWARD SOCIAL CHANGE ACCEPTANCE IN ORDER TO AVOID LOSING IT’S ROLE AS THE “STATE CHURCH” AND ITS BISHOP’S SEATS IN PARLIAMENT.

Rev Thomas Littleton

12/26/ 2023

Sam Allberry is one of the lead activist imported from the UK CoE business into the US “conversations” on sexuality and gender.This minefield of activist narratives was embedded in the terrain in the Southern Baptist Convention, its churches, seminaries, the Presbyterian Church in America and among convictional and conservative churches thanks to trusted leaders like Albert Mohler, Tim Keller, Russell Moore and their organizations like SBTS, TGC & ERLC.

FEW KNEW THE REALITY BEHIND THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND SSA AMBASSADOR TO AMERICA. 

The Church of England , which has been in steep decline for many decades, enacted dialectical conversations in 2013 responding to the Parliament’s legalization of same sex marriage. By forming study groups, commissioning a report and implementing nationwide controlled dialog events, they set out to bring change in attitudes toward and to move the churches few remaining active members to accept homosexual /LGBTQ inclusion and Same Sex Marriage inside the church.

CHURCH OF ENGLAND AND THE PILLINGS REPORT

Pilling Report published

28/11/2013

“The Archbishops of Canterbury and York have today published the Report of the House of Bishops Working Group on Human Sexuality.“

“In a statement thanking the working group – chaired by Sir Joseph Pilling – for its report, the Archbishops commented that the report “is a substantial document proposing a process of facilitated conversations in the Church of England over a period of perhaps two years. The document offers findings and recommendations to form part of that process of facilitated conversations. It is not a new policy statement from the Church of England.“

“Noting that “the issues with which the Report grapples are difficult and divisive” the Archbishops recognise Sir Joseph’s Pilling’s comment that ‘disagreements have been explored in the warmth of a shared faith’. The Archbishops continue “Our prayer is that the process of reflection that will now be needed in the Church of England, shaped by the House of Bishops and the College, will be characterised by a similar spirit.”

“Commissioned by the House of Bishops of the Church of England in January 2012, the working group included the bishops of Gloucester, Birkenhead, Fulham and Warwick. The group invited three advisers to join in the work. They were: Professor Robert Song, The Ven Rachel Treweek and the Revd Dr Jessica Martin.”

FAILURE TO DECEIVE

Ten years later the efforts have proven a failure and remain a major source of division and fear and loathing between Parliament and Englands “State Church”. Real Christians who actually read their bibles and history know the outcomes the Parliament and the Church of England seek to obtain from this dialectical process are not possible because they are unbiblical and invite divine judgement. If successful then the church is no longer the church. Yet none of this has deterred Leaders on both sides of the Atlantic from continuing to push the effort and the dialectical messengers like Allberry and a herd of others. Their message is rooted in SOGI and the globalist desire to normalize and assign special rights to LGBTQ identified people.

NOTE- ALLBERRY CAME TO AMERICA AND BUILT AN IMPRESSIVE PLATFORM OF INFLUENCE CONSTRUCTED ON HIS HOMOSEXUAL DESIRE AND IDENTITY.

SAM ALLBERRY

“Sam Allberry is an editor for The Gospel Coalition, a global speaker for Ravi Zacharias International Ministries, and a pastor based in Maidenhead, UK. He is the author of a number of books, including Is God Anti-Gay? (Good Book, 2013), James For You, and, most recently, Why Bother with Church? He is a founding editor of Living Out, a ministry for those struggling with same-sex attraction.”

NOTE IT WAS AL MOHLER /SBTS DISCIPLE AND REVOICE FOUNDER NATE COLLINS WHO FIRST “REVIEWED ” ALLBERRY’S BOOK “IS GOD ANTI GAY” FOR THE GOSPEL COALITION IN 2013. THESE EFFORTS IMPORTED FROM THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND’S ACITVISM WERE HIGHLY COORDINATED BY TGC AND ITS LEADERS LIKE MOHLER AND MOORE.

Is God Anti-Gay?

JULY 15, 2013  |  NATE COLLINS

“In this brief but important book, Is God Anti-Gay? And Other Questions about Homosexuality, the Bible, and Same-Sex Attraction, Sam Allberry combines pastoral wisdom, authentic autobiography, and sound exegesis to provide Christians with a helpful introduction to the topic of homosexuality…”

(NOTE COLLINS HOLDS TWO DEGREES FROM MOHLER’S SBTS AND ALLBERRY ALSO PROMOTED REVOICE “FOR OUR US AUDIENCE” WHEN REVOICE LAUNCHED IN 2018 WHILE COLLINS TAUGHT NEW TESTAMENT AND COMPLETED HIS BOOK AND DOCTORATE AT SBTS. AGAIN THE FOUNDER OF REVOICE AND ALLBERRY HAVE CLOSE TIES TO MOHLER AND TGC. )

NATE COLLINS LINKED IN:

Experience

• President and Founder President and FounderRevoice.usRevoice.us Mar 2018 – Present · 5 yrs 11 mos Mar 2018 – Present · 5 yrs 11 mos Greater St. Louis Area Greater St. Louis Area
• Ministry Associate Ministry Associate The Sight Ministry The Sight Ministry Sep 2013 – Present · 10 yrs 5 mos Sep 2013 – Present · 10 yrs 5 mos Greater Nashville Area, TN Greater Nashville Area, TN
• The Southern Baptist Theological SeminaryThe Southern Baptist Theological Seminary3 yrs 10 mos3 yrs 10 mos
  • Online Teaching AssistantOnline Teaching AssistantAug 2015 – May 2018 · 2 yrs 10 mosAug 2015 – May 2018 · 2 yrs 10 mosLouisville, Kentucky AreaLouisville, Kentucky Area
    • • Creating online learning assessments, engaging with students in discussion forums, compiling and assigning final course gradesCreating online learning assessments, engaging with students in discussion forums, compiling and assigning final course grades
  • Instructor of New Testament InterpretationInstructor of New Testament InterpretationJul 2015 – Jun 2016 · 1 yrJul 2015 – Jun 2016 · 1 yrLouisville, Kentucky AreaLouisville, Kentucky Area
  • Garrett FellowGarrett FellowAug 2014 – May 2016 · 1 yr 10 mosAug 2014 – May 2016 · 1 yr 10 mos
    • • Responsibilities include grading class assignments, corresponding with students regarding course requirements, assisting with teaching responsibilities as needed.

WORLDVIEW WEEKEND HAS DONE EXTENSIVE EXPOSURE OF THIS PRO LGBTQ “CHRISTIAN ” MOVEMENT AND ITS ORIGINS OVER THE YEARS WITH THIS AUTHOR.

ERLC AND RUSSELL MOORE ADVOCATE REDEFINING FAMILY AND PROMOTE GAY PRIEST WHO WANTS TO BABYSIT YOUR CHILDREN.

Mon, 10/22/2018 by Thomas Littleton

Trusted Church Denominations & Seminaries Producing LGBTQ Activists

Mon, 05/14/2018

ALSO AN EXCELLENT NEW CALVINIST EXPOSE’ ON ALLBERRY EXPLAINS THE ORIGINS OF “SSA LANGUAGE ” FROM THE LAUSANNE MOVEMENT’S VAUGHN ROBERTS AND THE IMPACT OF ALLBERRY ON THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND.

“Sam Allberry is a priest of the Church of England who has popularized the phrase of ‘same-sex attraction’ in the Church. Describing himself ‘as someone who lives with homosexuality’, he teaches that ‘homosexuality’ and ‘same-sex attraction’ (SSA) are interchangeable, although he prefers the phrase SSA. ‘I prefer to talk in terms of someone who experiences homosexual feelings, or same-sex attractions (SSA)’ (p11) Sam tends to avoid the word ‘gay’ because he does not want his sexual preference to describe who he is as a person.  He wants to be known as a ‘same sex attracted Christian’.  He writes: ‘I have found biblical Christianity a wonderful source of comfort and joy.’ (p10)”

“Together with his two same-sex attracted friends, Sean Doherty and Ed Shaw, and with the support of Vaughan Roberts, President of the Proclamation Trust, Sam Allberry leads a mission to promote his same-sex ideology through a website, entitled Living Out.  He has also written the book, Is God anti-gay? which has become a best-seller in the evangelical world.  Yet the phrase same-sex attraction is unknown in Scripture.  “

FOR MORE ON CoE EFFORTS AND LIVING OUT /REVOICE AND THE ” PILLNGS REPORT” READ HERE :

SAM ALLBERRY ,TGC EDITOR AND LIVING OUT COFOUNDER- ORGANIZATION NOW TARGETS CHILDREN WITH RADICAL LGBTQ MESSAGE.

ALLBERRY IN AMERICA

Mohler, Allberry, Moore At T4G “Together for the Gospel” in 2014 : 

HOMOSEXUALITY: OUR THIRD RAIL?

Speakers: Albert Mohler, Russell Moore, Sam Allberry Year: 2014 Session: Panel Session

“Al Mohler sits with Sam Alberry, author of “Is God anti-Gay?”, and Russell Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberties Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, to discuss the issue of homosexuality. Mohler says that, “this issue is in many ways the frontline issue of our engagement with the culture and with people — some of whom struggle with this issue personally. Others struggle with how anyone can hold anything other than the position that the dominant culture says is mandatory.” Holding this in tension, these brothers discuss how this issue affects our evangelism and ministries.”

WHY WERE AMERICAN EVANGELICAL LEADERS LOOKING TO A GAY PRIEST FROM A STATE RUN CHURCH OF ENGLAND FOR MESSENGING TO AMERICAN CHURCHES?

The answer likely has direct ties to the sudden increase in US churches involvement in faith based partnership grants and in operating its missions organizations within NGO guidelines working directly with the United Nations. Meanwhile Allberry had come straight from the CoE and Vaughn Roberts 2010 Lausanne involvement to spread the SSA inclusion message stateside. Now 10 years later a dissapointed Parliament is seeking to strike back at the CoE for its failure to bring about compliance.

BOOT THE BISHOPS & STRIP THE CoE OF STATE CHURCH STATUS -WHAT THE ENGLISH GOVERNMENT JUST THREATENED TO DO.

“Advent is the season when the Church of England usually runs a campaign to get more people into church, and this year is no exception. “Follow The Star: Join The Song” is a drive to get more people singing, and a new melody for a traditional carol, “The First Nowell,” by one of Britain’s most acclaimed choral composers, Bob Chilcott, has been specially written for the campaign. But this Advent is going to be remembered for a different first. Last Sunday, the third Sunday in Advent, the Church of England launched its prayers of blessing for same-sex couples.”

“Called Prayers of Love and Faith, they are the result of seven years of discussion within the Church of England about what its pastoral response to same-sex relationships should be. But the blessing may be too little too late for critics of the church, which has been declining in attendance and support for decades, and the state. A bill seeking to “disestablish” the Church of England was presented to the House of Lords last week that, while it has little chance of passing, signals a growing discomfort with the relationship between church and state in the country. A major reason is the church’s stance on same-sex marriage, which stands in contrast to the law of the land and has long alienated politicians and peers.”

THE LONG TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THE THREAT.

Long Term the Church of England cannot continue to exist without government support and has little left to boast of related to national influence based only on its dwindling membership.

An internal study reveals:

“The total Worshipping Community was 1,113,000 people in 2019; 1,031,000 people in 2020; and 966,000 people in 2021. The Church of England’s Worshipping Community in 2021 was about 1.7% of the population of England.”

NOW ADD THE PRESSURE TO FORCE ACCEPTANCE OF THE LGBTQ AGENDA AND …

CoE IS “BELEAGUERED BY THE SSA ISSUE AFTER A DECADE OF GOVERNMENT PRESSURE. 

“According to Malcolm Brown, the Church of England’s director of mission and public affairs, the bill is a way of gauging what the church’s critics think.”

“We feel rather beleaguered over same-sex issues,” said Brown. “A lot of people in Parliament feel we should be brought into line on same-sex marriage.”

“Same-sex marriage has been legal in England and Wales for almost 10 years, but the amendments to the 2010 Equality Act that paved the way for legalizing same-sex marriage also ensured a get-out clause for the Church of England so that its canon law would not be affected.”

NOTE ” FOR MORE ON ALLBERRY AND LIVING OUT’S ROLE IN THE CHURCH OF ENGLANDS ONGOING EFFORTS FOR LGBTQ INCLUSION READ HERE:

Sam Allberry

BAPTIST AND PRESBYTERIANS FLOODED BY ALLBERRY AND A HERD OF ACTIVIST.

FOR MORE ON ALLBERRY TIES TO REVOICE “LGBTQ /QUEER CHRISTIANITY ” MOVEMENT AND THE SWEEPING CHANGE AGENTS PROMOTING ALLBERRY IN CONSERVATIVE BAPTIST AND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHES -READ HERE- https://thirtypiecesofsilver.org/2019/06/10/the-tempest-in-sam-allberrys-teapotmuch-ado-about-not-talking-revoice-2019/

THE CHURCH ON BOTH SIDES OF THE ATLANTIC AND GLOBALLY REMAIN BETWEEN THE ROCK OF GOD’S REVEALED TRUTH AND HISTORY & THE HARD PLACE OF KEEPING PACE WITH THE ROTTING AND RAPIDLY DECLINING CULTURE. APPEASEMENT IS NOT THE ANSWER AND CHANGE AGENTS ALWAYS FAIL IN THE END BECAUSE RHETORIC AND NARRATIVES ARE NOT SUSTAINABLE NOR TRUTH .

THE CHURCH OF ENGLANDS EXCUSES SOUND EXACTLY THE SAME AS BAPTIST LEADERS LIKE MOHLER AND MOORE -ONLY THE AMERICAN CHURCH IS NOT A STATE CHURCH SO THE “NEED FOR CHANGE” IS ONLY DUE TO OTHER PRESSURES.

“In a modern, pluralistic, and secular society, it is a rather archaic and unjustifiable religious privilege at the heart of our constitution to be implanted at the very heart of the organization and management of the State,” Lord Scriven wrote in an article for National Secular Society.”

“The bill is designed to separate Church and State by removing the Church’s privileged, established status, the automatic right of bishops to sit in the House of Lords and the monarch’s role as Supreme Governor of the Church of England — a role recently highlighted when King Charles III was crowned in an Anglican coronation ceremony in May.”

“Although the bill has little chance of becoming law — it was not presented by the government, so it will be difficult to timetable debate — it does indicate a certain dissatisfaction with the established Church, and so has been noted with concern by its senior officials and bishops.”

“Brown does not think that the launch of Prayers of Love and Faith last Sunday will change opinion. “They will probably not be enough for those for whom identical treatment of LGBTQ people is an article of faith,” he said.”

CONCLUSION

ADMISSION OF FAILURE – READ CAREFULLY-

“At a time when the Church of England is facing this latest debate about its status, it is finding that some of its natural allies are no longer quite so friendly. Traditionally it was supported by members of the Conservative Party, known as One Nation Tories, who approved of the Church of England as a unifying body with a traditional role in society. But as the governing Conservative Party moves more to the right, fewer MPs tend to be One Nation Tories. Other Conservatives are far more critical of the Church of England and dislike commentary from the bishops on social issues.”

“One privilege of being an established church is that the Church of England has 26 bishops sitting in the House of Lords, where they often speak on those very issues, such as the cost of living crisis, poverty and migration, that are so sensitive for the government. One key establishment privilege is that the Archbishop of Canterbury, by virtue of his office, is allowed to bring a debate of his choice. Last Friday, the current Archbishop, Justin Welby, chose to speak on the family, linked to a commission on the issue that he initiated.”

GOD IS NOT INTERESTED IN POLITICS, PARLIAMENTS LAWS OR THE VOICES OF CHANGE AGENTS. BELOVED TRUST HIM AND STAY THE COURSE WITH HIS HOLY WORD AND THE BIBLICAL HOPE THE TRUE GOSPEL OFFERS.

1 Corinthians 6:9-11

⁹ “Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, ¹⁰ nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. ¹¹ And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.”

ANOTHER ROUND OF FAITH BASED / EVANGELICAL EMPHASIS FOR GLOBALIST WEF IS SET FOR THE JANUARY DAVOS 2024 MEETINGS. COLLABORATING WITH NGOs, LABOR LEADERS, CIVIL SOCIETY ADVOCATES, ASPENS INSTITUTE, AND A HODGE PODGE OF INTERFAITH RELIGIOUS COMPROMISERS-WEF TAKES “FAITH IN ACTION” INTO HIGH GEAR FOR 2024 U S ELECTION CYCLE AND RUN UP TO 2030 GLOBAL GOALS.

Rev Thomas Littleton

12/14/2023

“col·lab·o·ra·tion”

/kəˌlabəˈrāSH(ə)n/- 

2. “traitorous cooperation with an enemy.”

WEF/DAVOS 2024 “FAITH IN ACTION “

https://www.weforum.org/projects/faith-in-action/

Faith in Action

“The world is undergoing deep, complex and accelerated transformations, and neither government, nor business, nor civil society alone can address our common challenges. Religion, values and spirituality continue to shape the societal transformations of today – economic, geopolitical, technological and cultural. With over 80% of the global population adhering to religious and spiritual traditions, the influence of faith today underlines the need for multi-stakeholder action to solve global challenges and build social cohesion.”

“As part of its Civil Society Communities and across our Centres, the World Economic Forum engages roughly 125 religious leaders, faith-based organizations, interfaith groups, multi-faith networks, and experts of religion from over 10 of the world’s major religions and spiritual traditions.”

“In partnership with key global faith representatives, experts and community leaders, the Forum will launch a report (entitled “Faith in Action) in January 2024. The report will highlight contributions that faith communities and organizations are providing through public private partnerships. Covering key thematic areas for public-private cooperation (from urban transformation to climate action), the report will discuss the impact of religion and spirituality towards public private cooperation in today’s polycrisis and provide a roadmap for transformative partnerships with business, government and philanthropic organizations.”

“The report aims to accelerate the prosocial good of faith through multi-stakeholder partnerships, spotlighting key case studies of existing partnerships and what’s needed for meaningful collaboration between faith, business and other stakeholders. Case studies will focus on the impact of faith and areas of public-private cooperation, including: environmental care; health and healthcare; inclusive societies and social justice; just transition and sustainability; peace and reconciliation; technology and trust; thriving cities; values based investments and industry transformation.”

“In collaboration with report partners, the Forum is gathering case studies through the Faith in Action survey. To submit your impact examples on faith and public-private cooperation, please visit wef.ch/faithsurvey. The deadline to submit survey responses is September 15th, 2023. The full list of survey questions can be found here.”

SAMPLE QUESTIONS ON FAITH IN ACTION SURVEY

https://weforum.ent.box.com/s/kkzal8npnmeyri2pirhyf6f4f9a6frog 

“What is the name of the faith and business project?
Does the project have a website? If so please provide the project’s website address.
Describe the faith & business project in 300 words or less:
Does the faith & business project work in any of the following sectors? Check all that apply.”
o Environmental Care: Accelerating climate action towards net zero, circular
economies, and regenerative food, water and ocean systems.
o Values Based Investments and Industry Transformation: Allocating capital and
investment to support planet, people and communities
o Health and Healthcare: Scaling solutions for more resilient, efficient and equitable
healthcare systems.
o Inclusive Societies and Social Justice: Shaping inclusive, just, and equitable
societies that create opportunities for all.
o Thriving Cities: Strengthening community resiliency and local economies.
o Technology and Trust: Promoting ethical, human-centered and society-serving
technologies.
o Peace and Reconciliation: Helping progress peace within complex geopolitical
landscapes.
o Just Transition and Sustainability: Ensuring the energy transition is sustainable,
secure, resilient and affordable.
o Other impact areas not listed above:”

“What type of organization are you? Please select the description that best describes your
organization:
o Primary religious organization: These are organizations that have a primary religious
function and purpose like a church, a mosque, a temple, a denomination, a religious
order, etc.
o Secondary religious organization: This is a non-profit organization or charity that has
a religious mission.
o Indigenous led organization: This is an organization, instrument, agency, or other
body made up of a majority of Indigenous individuals.
o Indigenous community based organization: This is a nonprofit organization which is
representative of an Indigenous community or significant segments of an Indigenous
community Religious business: This is a business that self-identifies, either publicly or
privately, as guided by principles, values, and/or objectives associated with formal
religions or faiths.
o Spiritually centered and/or values led business: This is a business that has spiritual
and/or value driven sensibilities that are not directly aligned or associated with formal
religions or faiths.
o Non-religious business: A business that is operated without any religious
considerations. Non-religious non-profit/charity: This is a non-profit or charity that is
operated without any religious considerations.
o Public sector organization: This is a public sector entity working at the intersection of
faith and the public sector, and/or business.”

“Who are the primary beneficiaries of the project? Check all that apply.
o Children (i.e., 1-12 yrs. old) Young people (i.e., 13-21 yrs. old)
o Women
o Men
o Families
o Marginalized groups. Please list the marginalized groups your project helps.
o If your work is focused on beneficial outcomes for the environment, or other
outcomes than those human beneficiaries listed above, please name/describe the
beneficial outcome of your project(s), and if possible a quantitative measure of your
impact, e.g., “Old growth forest/50,000 acres.”
Beneficiary: (describe the beneficiary)
Quantitative Measure”

“To your knowledge and/or experience what are the most important factors for achieving
successful faith & business projects?
Important factor for successful faith & business projects:
Important factor for successful faith & business projects:
Important factor for successful faith & business projects:”

THE DAVOS DREAM TEAM

Partners

3BL Associates

Abu Dhabi Forum for Peace

ACT Alliance

Anti-Defamation League

Aspen Institute

Baha’i International Community

Conference of European Rabbis

Council for Inclusive Capitalism

El-Hibri Foundation

Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility

International Christian Union of Business Executives (UNIAPAC)

Mahamakut Buddhist University

Mata Amritanandamayi Math

Nishkam Centre

Religions for Peace

Religious Freedom & Business Foundation

Songdhammakalyani Monastry

Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding

United Nations

World Evangelical Alliance

LEADERS FROM THESE ORGANIZATIONS

David Sangokoya, Head of Civil Society Impact, World Economic Forum

Jack Hildebrand, Community Specialist, Civil Society, World Economic Forum

Natalie Cilem, Community Specialist, Civil Society, World Economic Forum

Gopal Patel, Co-Founder and Director, Bhumi Global; Co-Chair, UN Multifaith Advisory Council

Chris Elisara, PhD, Co-Director, World Evangelical Alliance Sustainability Center

Faith in Action Report Advisory Board:

Tariq Al-Olaimy, Co-Founder, 3BL Associates

Amma, Founder, Mata Amritanandamayi Math

Venerable Dhammananda Bhikkhuni, Abbess, Songdhammakalyani Temple

H.E. Sheikh Abdullah Bin Bayyah, Secretary General, Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies

Alexis Crow, Partner; Global Head, Geopolitical Investing, PwC

Rudelmar Bueno de Faria, General Secretary, ACT Alliance

Bani Dugal, Principal Representative to the United Nations, Bahá’í International Community

Reverend Mark E. Fowler, CEO, Tanenbaum Center for Interreligious Understanding

Rabbi Pinchas Goldschmidt, President, Conference of European Rabbis

Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO and National Director, Anti-Defamation League

Brian Grim, Founding President, Religious Freedom and Business Foundation

Azza Karam, Board Member, United Nations’ Secretary General High Level Advisor Board on Multilateralism

Farhan Latif, President, El-Hibri Foundation

Brie Loskota, Executive Director, Martin Marty Centre for Public Understanding of Religion, University of Chicago

Martin Palmer, Founding President and Chief Executive, FaithInvest

Venerable Anil Sakya, Deputy Dean, Faculty of Social Sciences, Mahamakut Buddhist University

Bp. Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher, Secretary General, World Evangelical Alliance

H.E. Bhai Sahib Mohinder Singh, Spiritual Leader and Chairman, Guru Nanak Nishkam Sewak Jatha

Simran Jeet Singh, Executive Director, Aspen Institute’s Religion and Society Program

Meredith Sumpter, CEO, Council for Inclusive Capitalism

Sir Mark V. Vlasic, KCHS, KCEM, CBS Television Studies

Rodrigo Whitelaw, General Secretary, International Christian Union of Business Executives (UNIAPAC)

Joshua Zinner, CEO, Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility

(NOTE- biography on WEF/ Faith in Action leader shows special focus on Social Justice and LGBTQ equality .

About Sangokoya who leads the “Faith in Action”WEF research.

“David Sangokoya is the Head of Civil Society Impact at the World Economic Forum. Based in Geneva, he is responsible for the Forum’s engagement and inclusion of nonprofits, marginalized communities, labour unions, social movements, religious organizations, and civil society innovators across its Centres and multi-stakeholder initiatives. In his role David drives the Forum’s stakeholder inclusion agenda and accelerates the impact of over 120 civil society partnerships across the Forum’s Centres on climate and nature action; industry transformation; social justice and inclusive economies; technology; and geopolitics. He additionally oversees the Global Future Councils on Human Rights, Social Cohesion and Just Transition; the Partnering with Civil Society in the Fourth Industrial Revolution initiative; and co-founded both the Forum’s internal Black and LGBTQI+ employee resource groups. David sits on the board of WINGS, a network of over 170 philanthropy development and support organizations across 57 countries committed to ensuring philanthropy reaches its fullest potential as a catalyst for social progress…With fifteen years of experience in research and global project management, David has worked at the intersection of social justice, sustainable development and responsible digital transformation.”

WEF/DAVOS CENTRAL FOCUS FOR DAVOS 2023 WAS “PRIDE ON THE PROMENADE ” LGBTQ + SOLIDARITY ON DAVOS MAINSTREET .

WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM BEYOND THE RAINBOW PUSH WILL CONTINUE TO SPILL OVER INTO CHURCH VIA COMPROMISED “CHRISTIAN”LEADERS.

WORLD EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE PLAYING A KEY ROLE

World Evangelical Alliance

@WEAnews

“World Economic Forum Report: Faith in Action The World Economic Forum will release a report entitled “Faith in Action” in January 2024 at Davos. Learn more:

1:42 PM · Dec 6, 2023

WEA LEADERS INVOLVED

Chris Elisara, PhD, Co-Director, World Evangelical Alliance Sustainability Center

Bp. Dr. Thomas Schirrmacher, Secretary General, World Evangelical Alliance

WEA “EMERGING LEADERS SUMMIT 2023 SET FORTH SOME OF THE “VALUES” AND POSITION STATEMENTS.

“Here are a few samples of participant comments:

• “We need a church with a radical sense of urgency because comfort and prosperity have become a plague to our church.”
• “Ministry without collaboration is like a journey without a destiny. To reach our destiny, it is essential to collaborate with people and move on.”
• “Collaboration must begin within our own environment before we can spread it to others.”
• “The urgency about making disciples and then having disciples make disciples is very important in fulfilling the Great Commission.”
• “The church has forgotten its primary duty to fulfill the mission it was called for. Through this conference, I have made a new commitment to mission.”

For a brief taste of the ELS experience, you can view this summary video.”

WEF “CIVIL SOCIETY”DRIVEN PROPAGANDA OF THE MOVEMENT- NOT REALM FOR CHRISTIAN FAITH

https://www.weforum.org/communities/civil-society/

“As part of the Forum’s multi-stakeholder approach, a diverse community of civil society leaders come together to find solutions, drive impact and advance multi-stakeholder cooperation with government and business leaders. The Forum’s Civil Society Community includes the engagement of the most influential organizations representing the interests of citizens, consumers, marginalized populations, workers, grassroots movements and social causes, including: international non-governmental organizations (INGOs); non-governmental organizations (NGOs), non-profits and charities; trade unions and labour organizations; social movements and activists, indigenous leaders and indigenous knowledge holders; community organizations; faith-based organizations and religious leaders.”

“Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), labour and religious leaders, faith-based organizations and other civil society stakeholders are key members of the World Economic Forum’s multistakeholder platform.”

“Civil society actors from a wide range of fields come together to collaborate with government and business leaders on finding and advocating solutions to global challenges. They also focus on how to best leverage the transformation brought by the Fourth Industrial Revolution and partner with industry, philanthropy, government, and academia to take action and engage in the development, deployment, use, and governance of technology.”

(NOTE IN 2015 THE LAUSANNE MOVEMENT, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS AND OTHER WORLD EVANGELICAL ALLIANCE AFFILIATES LED BY EVANGELICAL OPERATIVES SUCH AS TIM KELLER, ED STETZER, RICK WARREN AND DAVID PLATT SOUGHT TO LAUNCH “CIVILITAS” A NOW FAILED ATTEMPT TO REDEFINE CHRISTIAN MISSION WITH SOCIAL JUSTICE AND GLOBAL GOALS “CIVIL SOCIETY” ASSERTING THAT “LACK OF CIVILITY’ WAS THE BIGGEST THREAT TO SOCIETY IN THE MODERN ERA. THE EFFORTS FELL FLAT AND THE WEBSITE AND MANIFESTO CAN ONLY BE FOUND ON INTERNET ARCHIVE SITES. SEE THE PROPAGANDA FILLED LAUSANNE / IASC /FRANKFURT SCHOOL INSPIRED RUBBISH AT THE ARCHIVE LINK BELOW.)

WEA AFFILATE ORGANIZATION LAUSANNE MOEMENT IS CELBRATING 50 YEARS WITH A PRAYER GUIDE AND DOUBLING DOWN ON ITS GLOBAL GOALS AGENDA.

” One of the fruits of the Lausanne Congress was the Lausanne Covenant, a declaration of
evangelical faith which has become a point of reference for the mission of evangelical
believers in the world. 50 years later, this International Week of Prayer of the European
Evangelical Alliance gives us the opportunity to reconsider the Covenant”

CIVILITAS -LAUSANNE 2015

This horrific failed politically motivated call by Civilitas was led by Lausanne and included many key leaders among American biblically conservative movements .It was drafted largely by the Frankfurt School Inspired Institutes for Advanced Studies in Culture and featured the Chik-Fil -A corporate compromise with the LGBTQ agenda as a primary example of embracing and living out the “Civilitas Vision” . As with most IASC/ James Davison Hunter operations -it sought to shame biblically convictional Christians for their conservative social and political stance and more them LEFT toward a classic “Third Way” compromise and eventual collapse.

“Civil conversations will work to change the tone of our
society by supplanting vitriolic public discourse with respectful
listening, constructive exchange, and positive partnerships.
Dan Cathy, President and CEO of Chick-Fil-A developed an
improbable model of such civility in a surprising friendship with
Shane Windmeyer, national director of the LGBT group Campus
Pride.”

Click to access civilitas_vsp_paper.utv.pdf

GEO-POLITICAL FOCUS:WEF /LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS SHARE CONCERN OVER HOW EVANGELICALS VOTED IN 2016 AND 2020 : THE PROBLEM MUST BE FIXED

NOTE- THAT WEF TURNED TO THE HEADQUARTERS OF FABIAN SOCIALSM -THE SELF PROFESSED WOLVES IN SHEEPS CLOTHING WHO CLOAK THEMSELVES IN RELIGIOUS GARMETS TO DECEIVE CHRISTIANS.LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS VOICE WEF/DAVOS/ GLOBALIST CONCENRS OVER HOW AND WHY CHRISTIANS VOTE:

London School of Economics and Political Science

Apr 26, 2021

Evangelicals and Their Politics: Dispatches from the Field

“Then-President Donald Trump is surrounded by evangelical leaders during the Announcement of the Guidance on Constitutional Prayer in Public Schools, January 2020 | Photo: The White House“

(NOTE THE CENTRAL CONCERN OF LSE/WEF- “As has been well-documented by now, American evangelicals do not separate their faith from politics. They see political engagement as a civic responsibility that is deeply entwined with and influenced by their faith.” EXCERPT FROM FULL ARTICLE REPRINTED BELOW.)

“In the 2016 and 2020 US Presidential elections, evangelical Christians voted overwhelmingly for Donald Trump. In this blog post, Dr Katie Gaddini of UCL unpicks the political relationship this type of Christianity had with Donald Trump, how it changed in 2020, and what it means for American politics moving forward. “

“RGS and the US Centre’s USAPP Blog have launched a new joint series focusing on religion in American society, bringing in experts to explore the relationship different faith groups have with American society. Join us on 15 June, as we host a free LSE Public Lecture titled Religious Freedom under the Biden Administration with the US Centre and Department of International Relations.“

“In 2016, 81% of evangelical Christians voted for Donald Trump for the 45^th President of the United States. Although evangelicals have aligned with the Republican party for decades, this vote amounted to the largest evangelical vote in nearly twenty years. Many journalists, academics, and even some Christian leaders reacted to the 2016 election with dismay at what they saw as the incongruency between evangelical values and Trump’s behaviour, including two divorces, numerous affairs, and countless indiscretions. Four years later, these same journalists, academics and Christian leaders waited to see what Trump’s evangelical base would do at the 2020 Presidential election. Would an impeachment trial, allegations of sexual misconduct and hundreds of controversial Twitter posts be enough to dissuade evangelicals from voting for Trump again?”

“It turns out the answer is a resounding no. Exit polls from the 2020 election estimate that anywhere from 76-81% of evangelicals voted for Trump, meaning that his evangelical base remained committed. For those of us who research evangelicalism and politics these figures do not come as a surprise. For one thing, evangelicals’ approval for Trump remained high throughout his presidency, largely because Trump introduced and upheld the political issues that evangelicals hold dear, including pro-life, pro-Israel, and pro-abstinence-only education policies. But there are other, more nuanced reasons that evangelicals voted again for Donald Trump as President, which I have discovered through my on-going qualitative research on evangelical Christianity and politics in America. Here, I offer some brief dispatches from the field – bearing in mind that “the field,” just like religion and politics moreover, is fluid and ever-changing.”

“Revisiting 2016“

“When I interviewed American evangelicals and British evangelicals in 2016, I wanted to compare their attitudes towards two major political events: the presidential election and Brexit, respectively. As has been well-documented by now, American evangelicals do not separate their faith from politics. They see political engagement as a civic responsibility that is deeply entwined with and influenced by their faith. Interestingly, British evangelicals feel similarly, even though they tend to align with political issues rather than political parties. The two churches that my research participants attended shared a close connection: they sang the same worship songs on Sunday, they read the same Bible-study books, pastors often moved between the two churches, and congregants made pilgrimage-like trips across the Atlantic to visit one another. Their views on how faith intersects with politics, however, differed dramatically. While the American evangelicals I spoke with voted for Trump because of his strict immigration policies, their British counterparts voted against Brexit for the very same reason. Both groups relied on scripture to defend their position and both saw immigration as intimately linked to their faith. However, as this research demonstrates, what it means to be an ‘evangelical’ in the US is different from in the UK, even when key tenants of their faith and religious practices remain the same. Like all identities ‘evangelical’ is an inherently empty category and is dependent on its social-historical-political context for meaning. And in 2016, the interaction of fundamental identities – religious, political, and national – led to very different priorities for these two groups of evangelicals.”

2020

“Four years later I once again found myself conducting interviews with evangelicals ahead of a presidential election. However, my findings so far show that although immigration remains a top concern for American evangelicals, it is no longer the top concern. Without a doubt, there are two major events of the past year which shaped evangelicals’ political priorities when it came time to vote last November. Firstly, the Black Lives Matter (BLM) protests, which ripped across the United States in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death in June 2020, became a top concern for evangelical voters. For evangelicals living near cities in blue states, such as Seattle, where the protests were especially active, the BLM protests strengthened their support for Trump, who they saw as a stabilising force and a President committed to stamping out identity politics. Moreover, they view Trump as committed to challenging mainstream liberal media, which often emphasised the peacefulness of the BLM protests in reportage, instead of the violence—and symbolised a much larger battle conservative evangelicals are waging against the censorship of free and fair speech.”

“The second concern for evangelical voters last November was the Covid-19 pandemic. In the words of one of my research participants who works for a Republican lobbying firm: “If it wasn’t for the pandemic, Trump would have won again, no question.” He stated this opinion in reference to Republican voters overall, yet for the evangelicals I interviewed, the pandemic solidified their support for Trump. As an anti-establishment President waging war with the mainstream media and the World Health Organisation, Trump was the last stalwart of freedom in the era of lockdowns, mass vaccination programmes and mandatory mask-wearing. For a group deeply dedicated to freedom – the freedom to bear arms, the freedom of speech, the freedom to worship as they want – the restrictions that politicians have imposed in the name of the Covid-19 pandemic, have caused many evangelicals to cling even more staunchly to their understanding of freedom, which they believe is the bedrock of American democracy. And which they fear is in grave danger under a Democratic President and an on-going pandemic.”

“What Now?“

“Six months later, even though Trump is no longer President, his brand of politics – irreverent, anti-establishment,  and determined – continues. The question is: what now? What will happen with the 74 million people who voted for Trump in 2020, significant numbers of which are evangelical Christians? To which politicians, social movements, and issues will Trump’s evangelical base turn? Both well-established and up-and-coming GOP politicians who espouse Trumpist ideology, such as Madison Cawthorne, Ted Cruz, and Cindy Hyde-Smith, continue to garner the favour of many evangelicals, as evidenced by the Cruz and Hyde-Smith’s recent visit to the US-Mexico border. Will one of them run in the 2024 Presidential election?”

“For a scholar of evangelical Christianity, I am asking all of these questions, as well as wondering how the imbrication of religion and politics in America will twist and turn over the coming years shaping both evangelical culture and the political impact to which it aspires.”

“Note: This piece gives the views of the author, and not the position of the LSE Religion and Global Society blog, nor of the London School of Economics.“

LABOR LEADERS -NEW TO THE PATNERSHIPS

(NOTE : IN ORDER TO AID THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATIONS EFFORTS TO RE-ENERGIZE IT’S BASE AMONG LABOR UNIONS AND TO ESCAPE THE APPEARANCE OF BEING “IN BED WITH CORPORATE SELF INTEREST” AND “BIG BUSINESS CRONY CAPITALIST IN THE FAITH BASED COLLABORATION/ PARTNERSHIPS – BIG LABOR “LEADERS” HAVE BEEN ADDED TO THE WEF “CIVIL SOCIETY LINE UP.)

“Labour Leaders”

“Labour organizations are crucial to ensuring that economic policies are more inclusive and that workers’ issues are addressed by decision-makers. This is why labor unions and worker organizations are engaged in dialogues and initiatives on globalization, economic revitalization, environment, employment, and social protection, the global financial system, financial inclusion, the future of work, and sustainable production.”

“Labour Leaders are actively engaged in the World Economic Forum’s annual and regional meetings and summits, Global Future Councils, and platforms. Deeper interaction and integration have led to substantive involvement in a range of international governance processes and sector-led dialogues.”

GLOBAL FUTURE COUNCILS OF WEF AND COLLABORATION

“The World Economic Forum’s network of Global Future Councils is the world’s foremost multistakeholder and interdisciplinary knowledge network dedicated to promoting innovative thinking to shape a more resilient, inclusive and sustainable future. “

“The network convenes around 600 of the most relevant and knowledgeable thought leaders from academia, government, international organizations, business, and civil society, grouped in expertise-based thematic councils. It is an invitation-only community and members are nominated for a two-year term.”

Mission“

“The Network helps to identify and disseminate transformative ideas with the potential for global impact. The Global Future Council members provide strategic insights, scientific evidence, forward guidance, and multidisciplinary understanding of major issues through:”

• Fresh ideas and innovative thinking: Nurturing cutting-edge and disruptive ideas and developing the foresight to identify and shape key areas

• Grounding in expertise and evidence: Providing a foundation for data-, evidence-, fact- and research-based public-private cooperation 

• Interdisciplinary and systems approach:  Connecting the dots between established and frontier issues and integrating thought leaders from business, academia, civil society, government and international organizations”

“Councils play two types of roles – Frontier exploration to address cutting-edge themes that have transformative potential, infuse new ideas, connect frontier thinkers and serve as test beds for future workstreams; and, systems thinking to contribute in a meaningful way to complex global discussions and issues where a multistakeholder group of constituents can drive positive systemic change.”

Members’ engagement

“The Global Future Councils are invitation-only communities and members are invited for a two-year term. Council members participate regularly in virtual interactions and council activities via the Forum’s TopLink platform, email and regular meetings. Each council’s insights are also taken forward by the Forum’s ongoing initiatives, communities and meetings to ensure impact and influence. “

CONCLUSION

WORLD EVANGLEICAL ALLIANCE has not only openly embraced the United Nations and World Economic Forum AGENDA 2030 and Sustainable Development Goals but it has committed long term to influencing and recruiting the entire evangleical community with it’s denominations, churches, missions organizations, Christian education institutions and parachurch organizations into the grand end times globalist anti/christ deceptions. This demonic hoard promises to be one of the most broadly influential contaminations and infiltrations by false doctrine of the UN’s deadly multifaith spirituality that the church has ever experienced. It is truly apocalyptic and prophetic in scope. Get out of any church and STOP donating money to every organization which supports WEA/Lausanne/ NAE or those key evangelical deceivers who promote these errors.

WITH EVANGELICAL LEADERSHIP HAVING JOINED IN BOTH “REFUGEE” MIGRATION AND ISLAMIC EXPANSE IN AMERICA, NOW THE NEED FOR ADDED SECURITY, MORE GRANTS AND GREATER INTRUSION INTO THE CHURCH SEEMS FULLY JUSTIFIED. BUT WHAT DANGERS AWAIT THE MERGER OF FEDERAL AGENCIES AND CHRISTIAN HOUSES OF WORSHIP?

Rev Thomas Littleton 12/6/2023

WANT ARMED SWAT TEAM MEMBERS AT YOUR HOUSE OF WORSHIP? THANK AN EVANGLEICAL WHO SOLD “REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT ” TO THE CHURCHES. (PHOTO from RNS ARTICLE.)

Many US missions organizations and denominations have played key roles in the recent massive influx of migrants into America. Organizations like the Southern Baptist ERLC and outlets like Trinity Forum have lobbied for “Immigration Reform” in order to keep the billions in grant funding flowing into their coffers. The only political hindrance to the flow of government and activist /Soros /open borders-laden cash into these corrupt “Christian “organizations has been a temporary setback brought about by the Trump administration’s so-called “Muslim Ban”.

Evangelical ministries like World Relief partnered with the US Conference of Catholic Bishops to offer community-based / Faith-Based Partnership alliances with federal agencies. Many church and missions organizations were recruited directly by World Relief to join the funding and offer community connections to process, PLACE AND PROVIDE social services and welfare to “refugees” while restricting any ministry-based or “explicitly religious” activity such as prayer, worship of giving away bibles. Still, the evangelical leaders seeking to generate participation and cooperation with these programs continue to maintain and project the work as gospel ministry. NOW after the fruit of years of expanded Muslim Refugee aid, the churches and houses of worship find themselves in need of more grants and ever more direct involvement by government agencies to protect them from the very forces the “Refugee” infiltration has created and intensified.

SOME HISTORY OF THE GROWING PROBLEM OF REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT AS GOSPEL MINISTRY.

HOW DEEP ARE THE SBC/NAMB/ SEND RELIEF INVOLVED IN MUSLIM REFUGEE CARE?

SOUTHERN BAPTIST NAMB /SEND RELIEF BUILD MUSLIM WELCOME CENTER & FEMA RESPONSE HUB

REFORMED BAPTIST THEOLOGIAN ALBERT MOHLER, WHO DISCIPLED SOROS FUNDED IMMIGRATION REFORM ADVOCATE RUSSELL MOORE ATTENDED A CHURCH INVOLVED IN “REFUGEE CARE”.

https://thirtypiecesofsilver.org/2020/02/27/albert-mohlers-home-church-training-flock-in-refugee-resettlement-community-service/

SEMINARIES ARE FLOODED

SEMINARY REPORT ASSERTS COVID HAS HELPED TURN CHURCHES INTO SOCIAL SERVICE CENTERS.

FOR MORE INFORMATION AND BACKGROUND ON THE PROBLEMS WITH REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT AS MINISTRY CAN BE FOUND IN THESE RESEARCH ARTICLES.

ENTER DHS AND CISA /CYBER AND INFRASTRUCTURE AGENCY -SECURITY PLAN FOR HOUSES OF WORSHIP.

THE INTRUSION AND TRAINING WILL BE NEVER ENDING IN A PARTNERSHIP FORGED OUT OF POLITICAL DESTRUCTION OF NATIONAL BORDERS AND MERGING RELIGIONS INTO A MULTIFAITH GLOBAL SPIRITUALITY.

https://www.cisa.gov/resources-tools/resources/physical-security-performance-goals-faith-based-communities

The guide is divided into five sections: “Identify,” “Protect,” “Detect,” “Respond” and “Recover.”

Physical Security Performance Goals for Faith-Based Communities

Publish Date

December 06, 2023

“The Physical Security Performance Goals for Faith-Based Communities—the first in a series of impending related documents geared toward industry partners—are a set of physical security practices that houses of worship and related facilities can use to reduce security risks to their congregations.
Faith plays an important role in communities across the United States, from providing social services such as food, shelter, and clothing, to fostering a sense of unity for those with similar spiritual beliefs. These welcoming communities are often physically centered around houses of worship, which strive for the right balance between
security and accessibility.
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is committed to partnering with faith groups to help mitigate the threat of targeted violence and prepare for potential incidents. To support communities, CISA developed
these performance goals to provide readily implementable, cost-effective solutions that can reduce risk. Once developed and broadly applied, the performance goals will enable houses of worship and related facilities— particularly those with limited resources—to effectively identify and manage risk.”

THE MODEL
The Physical Security Performance Goals model provides recommended considerations aligned with security best practices to mitigate identified threats. The model examines threats and vulnerabilities to provide targeted mitigation strategies, all of which are organized by the following functional categories: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and
Recover. This framework directly complements the five mission areas of the National Preparedness Goals, which are to prevent, protect against, mitigate, respond to, and recover from threats and hazards that pose the greatest risk.
The security performance goals in this document are displayed in a visual model to help readers understand not only the goals themselves, but also the intended outcomes, risks that the security goals address, and a benchmark for robust security practices. For additional information and context, please see the Resources section located at the end
of the document. For best practices related to cybersecurity, please see the Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance.” Goals.
Each goal is comprised of the following components:

The Physical Security Performance Goals for Faith-Based Communities are intended to:

• Establish a baseline set of physical security practices broadly applicable across houses of worship and related facilities with known risk factors.
• Create benchmarks to measure and improve physical security maturity and build community readiness and resilience.
• Articulate actionable guidance, including a prioritized set of physical security practices.
• Provide a unique tool to identify security gaps and create an actionable plan that aligns with the priorities of faithbased communities.
  The Physical Security Performance Goals for Faith-Based Communities are:
• Voluntary: These physical security goals are offered as options to enhance security posture and risk tolerance but do not place any obligation on a house of worship. This information can and should be tailored to the needs of each individual facility.
• Not Comprehensive: These physical security goals do not identify all the physical security practices needed to protect houses of worship. The goals capture a core set of practices with known security approaches that are broadly applicable. Considerations for implementation should include the size of the organization and unique
  challenges specific to the institution and its community. Baselines should be tailored to the needs of individual houses of worship.
  GETTING STARTED
  For houses of worship to successfully implement the security goals, consider identifying a security coordinator and additional security and safety planning team members (if possible) to develop a holistic security strategy. To effectively manage risk, ensure that:
• Risk assessments are conducted to understand the organization’s exposure to risk.
• Facilities, people, activities, and processes are identified.
• Relevant hazards, threats, and consequences to the organization are identified and documented.
• Evaluations on the likelihood of occurrence and effectiveness of existing controls are conducted.
• Mitigation strategies are developed, implemented, and regularly re-evaluated to ensure continuous improvement and adaptability.
  Organizations are also encouraged to leverage CISA Protective Security Advisors (PSAs)—security subject matter experts located across the country who directly support faith-based communities with vulnerability assessments, site
  visits, and training at no cost.

SAMPLE RECOMMENDATIONS

“DETECT”

• “Provide situational awareness training to help individuals quickly identify potential
  threats/hazards to allow for appropriate response to an incident.
• Utilize greeters at every entry point and parking lot to identify early warning signs of
  potential violence.
• For schools and daycares on property:
  ◦ Create a culture of reporting concerning behaviors. Students and staff may
  report concerns through a variety of ways (online forms, phone number, email, or
  application platforms).
  ◦ Establish a team that will assess a student’s behavior and provide intervention
  strategies such as counseling, mental health care, or social and family services.”

DETECT
“Power of Hello Houses of Worship Guide – introduces the OHNO
Approach: Observe, Initiate a Hello, Navigate the Risk, and
Obtain Help to assist staff, volunteers, and visitors in observing
and evaluating suspicious behaviors, and obtaining help when
necessary.
De-Escalation Series – contains four products to assist
personnel to identify and navigate suspicious activity or
potentially escalating situations, and to safely disengage and
report to local law enforcement or other appropriate authorities.
Making Prevention a Reality – practical guide on assessing and
managing the threat of targeted violence with concrete strategies
to help communities prevent these types of incidents.
Suspicious Activity and Items – information to recognize unusual
behaviors and suspicious items associated with IED threats.”

DHS ASSESSMENT OF THREATS FROM MAY 2023 FOR 2024 ELECTION CYCLE

Summary of Terrorism-Related Threat to the United States

“The United States remains in a heightened threat environment. Lone offenders and small groups motivated by a range of ideological beliefs and personal grievances continue to pose a persistent and lethal threat to the Homeland. Both domestic violent extremists (DVEs) and those associated with foreign terrorist organizations continue to attempt to motivate supporters to conduct attacks in the Homeland, including through violent extremist messaging and online calls for violence. In the coming months, factors that could mobilize individuals to commit violence include their perceptions of the 2024 general election cycle and legislative or judicial decisions pertaining to sociopolitical issues. Likely targets of potential violence include US critical infrastructure, faith-based institutions, individuals or events associated with the LGBTQIA+ community, schools, racial and ethnic minorities, and government facilities and personnel, including law enforcement.”

MORE GRANT HISTORY -MORE $$$ TO BE PROVIDED

“In 2022, DHS’s Nonprofit Security Grant Program (NSGP) provided over $250 million in funding to support target hardening and other physical security enhancements to non-profit organizations at high risk of terrorist attack.”

FY 2023

Total funding available for fiscal year 2023: $305 million

• Nonprofit Security Grant Program – UASI (NSGP-U) – $152.5 million
• Nonprofit Security Grant Program – State (NSGP-S) – $152.5 million

• PAST DHS/FEMA CISA INVOLVEMENT IN CHURCH “SECURITY ” IS DISTURBING INDEED. RECALL “THE POWER OF HELLO”?

BAPTIST MEDIA PROMOTES FEMA /DHS GRANTS TO CHURCHES FOR “NON PROFIT SECURITY PROGRAM”.

CONCLUSION:

IMMIGRATION DRIVEN BY INSIDE ACTIVISTS POLITICAL AGENDAS AND OPEN SOCIETY FUNDING IS NOT COMPASSION.

Ignore the carefully crafted narratives of voices coming from Bio-Logos, Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, Send Relief, World Relief, Trinity Forum and other organizations and the individuals who lead them promoting interfaith dialog, Multifaith community development and “Compassionate Conservatism AKA Faith Based Partnerships. Jesus was not a refugee or an illegal immigrant. He was/is God in the Flesh and not a tool to be used by globalists who use the “useful idiots” of evangelism.

From Rick Warren’s PEACE Plan with its heretical Chrislam to Marvin Olasky the “not so former” Marxist Compassionate Conservatism -BOTH primers for Faith Based Partnerships and NGO /UN alliances -these false ideologies and their false gospels are only endangering our churches and houses of worship with the groundswell of Islam in the West.

Let the reality that DHS and CISA and FEMA see the need to infiltrate, control and fund how churches do “security” and view Hamas attacks on Israel as an even greater opportunity BE A WAKE UP CALL for believers and church leaders everywhere .THIS “Refugee ” surge is planned and coordinated by those who have neither America nor Christian Faith and gospel ministry in mind. DO NOT BE DECEIVED.

THIS IS WHAT THE GOSPEL SOUNDS LIKE ..SOUND FAMILIAR AT ALL?

PAULS CLEAR GOSPEL CALL TO A NATION DROWNING IN IDOLS.

TO THE UNKNOWN GOD.

Therefore, the One whom you worship without knowing, Him I proclaim to you: ²⁴ God, who made the world and everything in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands. ²⁵ Nor is He worshiped with men’s hands, as though He needed anything, since He gives to all life, breath, and all things. ²⁶ And He has made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, and has determined their preappointed times and the boundaries of their dwellings, ²⁷ so that they should seek the Lord, in the hope that they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; ²⁸ for in Him we live and move and have our being, as also some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also His offspring.’ ²⁹ Therefore, since we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold or silver or stone, something shaped by art and man’s devising. ³⁰ Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent, ³¹ because He has appointed a day on which He will judge the world in righteousness by the Man whom He has ordained. He has given assurance of this to all by raising Him from the dead.”